Scots social employee struck off for violent assault that she hid from employer

A SCOTS carer has been struck off for a violent assault that left her sufferer scarred and bruised – which she tried to cover from her employer.

Michelle Doak was employed as a social employee with Hansel Alliance in Kilmarnock, North Ayrshire when she dedicated the assault in June 2021.

Disgraced Doak’s brutal assault noticed her enter an unnamed member of the general public’s house and beat them across the head.

Her actions left the person with a bruised cheek, a fractured rib and a lip laceration which has since turn out to be a scar.

Regardless of being arrested for her actions, Doak failed to tell each her employer and care watchdog the Scottish Social Providers Council (SSSC), resulting in an investigation into Doak’s health to practise by the latter.

Michelle Doak was employed as a social employee with Hansel Alliance in Kilmarnock, North Ayrshire when she dedicated the assault in June 2021.

The complete report states: “We determined there may be proof that whereas employed as a assist employee with Hansel Alliance at Hansel Village in Symington, Kilmarnock, you probably did:

“On or round 5 June 2021: enter ZZ’s property with one other and hit ZZ on the top, trigger or contribute to ZZ sustaining bodily accidents particularly:

“Bruising to the left cheek, laceration to left higher lip which left a everlasting scar, fracture to ZZ’s rib

“[You did] trigger or contribute to ZZ struggling misery and psychological trauma because of your actions.

“Between 5 June and 12 August 2021:

“Fail to tell your employer of the truth that you had been arrested by the police in relation to a felony offence of assault.

“Fail to tell the SSSC of the actual fact you had been arrested by the police in relation to a felony offence of assault.”

The SSSC panel discovered Doak’s health to apply was impaired, saying: “You assaulted a member of the general public inflicting them bodily and emotional hurt.”

“Violent behaviour is severe because it signifies values and attitudes incompatible with registration in a caring and accountable occupation.”

“You could have did not show developed perception into your actions and the consequences of your actions towards the member of the general public.

“There are issues about your angle and values that are much less simply remediated.”

“You failed to tell your employer and the SSSC that you just had been charged by police with a felony offence of assault.

“Such a failure meant that an acceptable threat evaluation was not in a position to happen in a well timed method which positioned service customers at a possible threat of hurt.”

“The behaviour is severe and there’s a threat of repetition.”

Doak, who confirmed no remorse or regret for her actions, and issued no apology, was faraway from the register as of yesterday (WED).

A spokesperson for Hansel right this moment mentioned: “Hansel welcome the choice by the SSSC to take away Ms Doak from the register of social care employees.

“This resolution displays the seriousness of the fees introduced towards Ms Doak for conduct outwith the office.

“We will affirm that Ms Doak has not been employed by Hansel since August 2021.

“Hansel is a charity that strives always to advertise and make sure the security, rights, care and wellbeing of the folks we assist and our staff members.

“We do that via engagement with our neighborhood and the appliance of strong insurance policies and procedures and consulting with the related authorities.”

More From Author

How long does a custody battle take?

Introduction What is a custody battle? How long goes the average custody battle take? What…

False Allegations Solicitors – Family Law Assistance

Introduction How false allegations are made Reasons to use a solicitor when you’re facing false…

What franchise should I buy?

Introduction What franchise should you buy – the factors to consider Initial and Ongoing Costs…